Most manufacturing companies manage their document workflows using a combination of paper files, scanned PDFs, and spreadsheets.
This setup works at a basic level but because of the manual nature of it, it often leads to delays, data entry errors, and inconsistent recordkeeping. Plus, these documents move through multiple hands and formats before they’re approved or archived.
Even if you’ve used automation solutions, they barely scratch the surface. They can’t handle different templates or handwritten documents—complicating the issue.
While manufacturing companies are torn between modernizing and maintaining control, between efficiency and legacy systems. The ghost of failed tech rollouts still lingers, feeding the lie that automation can't handle the messy reality of manufacturing documents.
The truth is that document automation platforms like Docxster are built for exactly that.
In this guide, we’ll walk you through 12 use cases for document processing in manufacturing companies to show you can use it too.
Finance teams spend a lot of time reviewing documents that directly affect cash flow—purchase orders, invoices, vendor forms, and approval records. They need to be validated, compared, and processed. In most cases, the information doesn’t arrive in a standardized way. That’s what slows things down.
The following examples break down where that friction happens and how intelligent document processing tools can alleviate some of the burden:
You're managing the constant juggle of matching invoices to POs across different systems. Your team opens an invoice PDF in one window, pulls up the corresponding PO in SAP in another, and carefully compares every line item.
When your biggest supplier sends handwritten invoices or that reliable vendor uses their own format, someone on your team needs to work through scanned documents and enter the data into Tally.
The complexity multiplies when amounts don't align or GST numbers are missing.
At the end of it, your finance team reaches out to procurement or contacts vendors directly to resolve discrepancies, which is a hassle.
When GST filing season approaches, your finance team faces the challenge of compiling documents from multiple sources. They're gathering vendor invoices from Gmail, accessing GSTN portals for returns, and coordinating with vendors for TDS certificates that often arrive close to deadlines.
Your team creates tracking systems to monitor which documents are complete, which ones need follow-up, and whether critical details like GSTIN numbers are accurate.
They’re dealing with 14-hour days at the end of each quarter just to compile these records accurately.
Your finance team manages payment documentation across multiple systems. For example, they’re:
But creating complete payment trails requires coordination across different platforms and careful attention to detail.
When vendors inquire about payment status, your team needs to check several systems to provide accurate information. And during audits, this problem gets worse.
When new vendors submit their registration information via email, your team works through comprehensive verification processes. These documents usually arrive with missing fields, formatting inconsistencies, or incomplete information that requires follow-up communication.
When your team finally coordinates with multiple departments, they realize these missing fields delay onboarding by 30 to 60 days. Why not reduce all the messy coordination instead?
Your employees submit expense reports through various channels. For example, email attachments with digital receipts, photos of handwritten bills, and detailed expense lists.
In this case, your finance team carefully reviews each submission, verifying amounts against receipts and ensuring compliance with company policies.
The verification process often involves follow-up communication to clarify unclear receipts, confirm merchant categories, or request additional documentation. All of these processes can be automated while still managing the large volume of expense submissions across your organization.
Your contracts contain important payment terms distributed across multiple documents and storage locations. Typically, teams look through various contract formats to locate specific payment conditions, discount opportunities, and deadline requirements.
When payment decisions need to be made quickly, they need to look at the exact terms in the contract with legal and procurement teams. Alternatively, they can spend time reviewing it on their own which requires quite a bit of time.
They can catalog as much as they want—but that also requires a lot of manual data entry which can be avoided.
Operations teams rely on documents to manage daily supply workflows—from ordering parts to tracking deliveries and recording handoffs.
Most of these documents come in at volume, vary by vendor, and aren’t built for easy review. When these workflows break down, teams lose time resolving mismatches, chasing approvals, or rechecking documents manually.
The following use cases show how automated document processing can reduce delays and improve coordination across purchasing, logistics, and inventory:
Your procurement team creates POs in SAP, which then need to be shared with vendors, operations, and other departments through various channels.
When your operations team needs to verify delivery details or track order status, they often need to locate specific POs across different storage systems.
The coordination becomes complex when item codes need verification, delivery addresses require confirmation, or quantities need to be cross-referenced with actual deliveries. Instead, you can automate this process.
When shipments arrive, your receiving team works with packing lists that often use different terminology and formatting than your internal POs.
Suppliers may reference products differently, use varying units of measurement, or include handwritten batch numbers that require careful interpretation.
Your team carefully compares line items, quantities, and specifications to ensure accuracy before accepting deliveries. If and when discrepancies come up, it’ll eventually impact delivery schedules while you verify things.
Your quality team documents inspections using various formats, for example:
When customers request quality documentation or audits require specific batch information, your team needs to locate and compile relevant QA records from different sources.
The process involves extracting batch numbers, test results, and inspector details from various report formats, then connecting this information to specific production runs and delivery records. You can automate this entire process instead.
When equipment issues arise and you need service history for warranty claims or troubleshooting, your team coordinates across different record-keeping systems.
You’ll have to access maintenance history and gather information from various sources to understand:
Your team can develop sophisticated workflows to track this information and get what they need in time.
Shift reports track daily production, including output, downtime reasons, and shift details. They’re key to spotting bottlenecks and comparing performance across teams.
Most reports are filled out on paper or in Excel but that also means that formats vary across teams, making trend tracking difficult. To make this easier for you, you need to standardize the information.
Delivery records show what arrived, when, and whether it matched the order. They include dates, quantities, and signed proof of delivery. These help track vendor reliability over time. Most teams store delivery slips or emails in shared folders.
To verify a delivery, someone compares the slip manually with the PO or packing list. There’s no structured way to track delays or short shipments. Vendor reviews are often built from scratch using unstructured data but they don’t have to be.
The daily dance of documents in manufacturing doesn't have to remain chaotic. What starts as manageable manual processes quickly becomes a bottleneck—with teams spending 70% of their time on data entry, chasing approvals, and fixing errors that automation could prevent.
For manufacturing companies processing hundreds or thousands of documents monthly, these inefficiencies compound into real costs: delayed shipments, compliance risks, and the need to hire more staff just to keep up with paperwork.
Docxster was built specifically for this messy reality. Unlike basic automation tools that break with handwritten forms or varying templates, our platform handles the complex, unpredictable document workflows that define manufacturing operations.
Curious about how you can use end-to-end document automation in your manufacturing company?
Get Document Intelligence in Your Inbox.
Actionable tips, automation trends, and exclusive product updates.